Website Accessibility Audit: Complete 2025 WCAG 2.2 Guide + Free Template

A website accessibility audit is a systematic evaluation of your site's compliance with WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards, identifying barriers that prevent people with disabilities from accessing your content. With 4,605 ADA lawsuits filed against websites in 2024 and the European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforceable June 28, 2025, accessibility audits are no longer optional—they're business-critical.

This comprehensive guide provides everything you need to conduct a thorough accessibility audit, whether you're a business owner evaluating vendors, an agency auditing client sites, or a developer implementing fixes.

What you'll get:

✅ Step-by-step WCAG 2.2 audit methodology
✅ Free downloadable audit template (Excel + PDF)
✅ Automated tools comparison (axe, WAVE, Lighthouse)
✅ Manual testing protocols (keyboard, screen reader)
✅ Cost breakdown (DIY vs. agency vs. automated)
✅ Real audit report examples

What is an Accessibility Audit?
Why Conduct an Accessibility Audit
Types of Accessibility Audits
WCAG 2.2 Audit Methodology
Automated Testing Tools
Manual Testing Protocols
Screen Reader Testing
Audit Report Structure
Cost of Accessibility Audits
DIY vs. Agency vs. Automated Audits
Common Audit Findings
Remediation Prioritization
Free Audit Template Download

What is an Accessibility Audit?

An accessibility audit (also called WCAG audit, web accessibility audit, or compliance audit) is a comprehensive evaluation of a website's adherence to accessibility standards, typically WCAG 2.2 Level AA.

What an audit includes:

1. Automated Testing (30% of issues)

Scan with tools like axe DevTools, WAVE, Lighthouse
Detect technical violations (missing alt text, color contrast, ARIA errors)
Generate violation reports with severity ratings

2. Manual Testing (70% of issues)

Keyboard navigation testing
Screen reader compatibility (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver)
Logical reading order verification
Focus management evaluation
Form accessibility testing

3. Audit Report

Compliance level (A, AA, AAA)
Detailed violation list with screenshots
Remediation recommendations
Priority ratings (critical, high, medium, low)
Estimated remediation effort

4. Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR)

VPAT documentation (for procurement)
Success criteria conformance levels
Known issues and limitations

Why Conduct an Accessibility Audit

1. Legal Compliance

United States:

4,605 ADA website lawsuits filed in 2024 (up 12% from 2023)
Average settlement: $25,000-$75,000
Legal fees: $50,000-$150,000
Domino's Pizza v. Robles (2019): Websites are "places of public accommodation"

European Union:

European Accessibility Act (EAA) enforceable June 28, 2025
Penalties up to €100,000 or 4% of annual turnover
Mandatory for all e-commerce selling to EU customers

Canada:

Accessible Canada Act (ACA) - federally regulated businesses
AODA (Ontario) - businesses with 50+ employees

2. Business Benefits

Revenue impact:

$13 trillion global disability market
27% higher conversion rates on accessible sites
35% lower cart abandonment across all users
1.3 billion people with disabilities worldwide (16% of population)

SEO benefits:

Accessible markup improves search rankings
Better mobile usability (overlaps with accessibility)
Lower bounce rates (better UX for everyone)

Brand reputation:

82% of customers prefer brands that prioritize inclusion
Demonstrates corporate social responsibility
Positive PR and media coverage

3. Risk Mitigation

Audit = proactive defense:

Identify issues before lawsuits
Document compliance efforts (shows good faith)
Establish remediation roadmap
Monitor ongoing compliance

Types of Accessibility Audits

1. Automated Audit (Quick, Limited)

What it is: Using automated tools (axe, WAVE, Lighthouse) to scan pages

Coverage: ~30% of WCAG issues

Time: 1-2 hours for small site

Cost: Free to $500/year for tools

Best for:

Initial baseline assessment
Ongoing monitoring
Developer testing during development
Catching obvious technical violations

Limitations:

Cannot test keyboard navigation
Cannot evaluate screen reader experience
Misses logical reading order issues
Cannot assess subjective criteria (e.g., "clear language")

2. Manual Audit (Comprehensive, Time-Intensive)

What it is: Human expert testing with keyboard and screen readers

Coverage: 100% of WCAG issues (combines automated + manual)

Time: 40-80 hours for medium site (50-100 pages)

Cost: $5,000-$25,000 depending on site complexity

Best for:

Legal compliance (pre-litigation)
Government/enterprise procurement
High-traffic sites with revenue risk
Critical applications (healthcare, finance, government)

What it includes:

Automated scan
Keyboard navigation testing
Screen reader testing (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver)
Mobile accessibility testing
Form submission testing
Video/multimedia testing
PDF accessibility (if applicable)

3. Hybrid Audit (Automated + Expert Review)

What it is: Automated scanning + expert validation of critical pages

Coverage: 60-80% of WCAG issues

Time: 8-20 hours

Cost: $2,000-$8,000

Best for:

Small to medium businesses
E-commerce stores
Marketing sites
SaaS applications

Approach:

Automated scan of all pages
Manual testing of critical user flows (homepage, product pages, checkout, forms)
Screen reader spot-checking
Prioritized remediation list

WCAG 2.2 Audit Methodology

Step 1: Define Audit Scope

Pages to test:

Homepage
All unique page templates (product, collection, article, etc.)
Key user flows (registration, checkout, contact form)
Critical functionality (search, filters, navigation)
10-20% sample of content pages

For large sites (1,000+ pages):

Test all templates (15-30 pages)
Sample 5-10% of each content type
Prioritize high-traffic pages (Google Analytics)

Platforms to test:

Desktop (Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
Mobile (iOS Safari, Android Chrome)
Tablet (iPad, Android tablet)

Step 2: Run Automated Scan

Use multiple tools (each catches different issues):

axe DevTools:

Browser extension (free)
Comprehensive WCAG 2.2 coverage
Detailed violation descriptions
Export reports (CSV, JSON)

WAVE:

WebAIM tool (free)
Visual feedback on page
Identifies structural issues
Color contrast analysis

Lighthouse:

Built into Chrome DevTools (free)
Accessibility score + performance + SEO
Part of standard web development workflow

Run scan on ALL pages in scope:

# Example: Automated scan with axe-core CLI
npm install -g @axe-core/cli
axe https://yourwebsite.com --tags wcag2a,wcag2aa,wcag21a,wcag21aa,wcag22aa --save results.json

Document findings:

Screenshot each violation
Note page URL
Record WCAG success criterion violated
Severity rating (critical, serious, moderate, minor)

Step 3: Keyboard Navigation Testing

Test ALL functionality using only keyboard:

Keys to test:

Tab - Move to next interactive element
Shift+Tab - Move to previous element
Enter - Activate buttons/links
Space - Toggle checkboxes, activate buttons
Arrow keys - Navigate within components (dropdowns, tabs, sliders)
Escape - Close modals/dialogs
Home/End - Jump to first/last item

What to verify:

All interactive elements reachable via Tab
Tab order follows visual order
Focus indicator visible (3:1 contrast minimum - WCAG 2.4.11)
No keyboard traps (can Tab out of all components)
Dropdown menus accessible via keyboard
Modals/dialogs trap focus and close with Escape
Forms submittable with Enter key

Common keyboard issues:

<!-- BAD: Div used as button (not keyboard accessible) -->
<div onclick="submitForm()">Submit</div>

<!-- GOOD: Semantic button -->
<button type="submit">Submit</button>

<!-- BAD: No focus indicator -->
<style>
  *:focus { outline: none; } /* WCAG 2.4.7 violation */
</style>

<!-- GOOD: Visible focus with 3:1 contrast -->
<style>
  *:focus {
    outline: 3px solid #0066CC;
    outline-offset: 2px;
  }
</style>

Step 4: Screen Reader Testing

Test with at least 2 screen readers:

NVDA (Windows - Free):

Download: https://www.nvaccess.org/
Most common screen reader globally
Test basic navigation and forms

JAWS (Windows - Commercial):

Trial: https://www.freedomscientific.com/
Enterprise standard
Test if your audience is business/government

VoiceOver (Mac/iOS - Free):

Enable: System Preferences → Accessibility → VoiceOver
Or Cmd+F5
Test mobile experiences

What to test:

1. Page structure:

Page title announced
Headings in logical order (h1 → h2 → h3)
Landmarks announced (header, nav, main, footer)
Skip links functional

2. Images:

All informative images have alt text
Decorative images have empty alt (alt="") or role="presentation"
Complex images have long descriptions

3. Links:

Link purpose clear from text alone ("Read more" fails, "Read more about WCAG 2.2" passes)
Links announced as "link" (not just text)

4. Forms:

All inputs have labels
Required fields indicated to screen reader (aria-required="true")
Error messages associated with inputs (aria-describedby)
Validation errors announced (role="alert")

5. Dynamic content:

Cart updates announced (aria-live="polite")
Error notifications announced (aria-live="assertive")
Loading states communicated

Step 5: Color Contrast Testing

WCAG 2.2 Requirements:

Normal text (< 18pt): 4.5:1 contrast ratio
Large text (≥ 18pt or ≥ 14pt bold): 3:1 contrast ratio
UI components and graphics: 3:1 contrast ratio
Focus indicators: 3:1 contrast against adjacent colors (WCAG 2.4.11)

Tools:

WebAIM Contrast Checker: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
axe DevTools (auto-detects contrast issues)
Chrome DevTools (inspect element → Accessibility pane)

Common failures:

/* FAILS: Light gray text on white (2.8:1) */
.product-price {
  color: #999999;
  background: #FFFFFF;
}

/* PASSES: Darker gray (4.5:1) */
.product-price {
  color: #595959;
  background: #FFFFFF;
}

Step 6: Mobile Accessibility Testing

WCAG 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) - NEW in 2.2:

Interactive elements must be at least 24×24 CSS pixels
Applies to: buttons, links, form inputs, checkboxes

What to test:

Touch targets large enough (44×44px recommended for better UX)
No horizontal scrolling required
Pinch-to-zoom not disabled (user-scalable=yes)
Font size ≥ 16px (prevents iOS auto-zoom)
Form labels above inputs (mobile best practice)

Test on real devices:

iOS (VoiceOver enabled)
Android (TalkBack enabled)
Tablet (larger screen reader gestures)

Automated Testing Tools

Tool Comparison Matrix

Tool	Cost	WCAG Coverage	Integration	Best For
axe DevTools	Free (basic)<br>$42/mo (pro)	WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA<br>Section 508	Browser extension<br>CLI<br>CI/CD	Developers<br>QA teams
WAVE	Free	WCAG 2.1 AA	Browser extension<br>API ($)	Visual feedback<br>Education
Lighthouse	Free	WCAG 2.1 AA	Chrome DevTools<br>CLI<br>CI/CD	General audits<br>Performance
Pa11y	Free	WCAG 2.1 AA	CLI<br>CI/CD	Automation<br>Monitoring
Accessibility Insights	Free	WCAG 2.1 AA	Desktop app<br>Browser extension	Windows apps<br>Guided testing
Siteimprove	$$$$	WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA	SaaS platform	Enterprise<br>Continuous monitoring
AllAccessible	Free trial<br>$$$	WCAG 2.2 AA<br>Real-time monitoring	SaaS<br>WordPress plugin<br>Shopify app	Real-time fixes<br>AI remediation

How to Use axe DevTools

Step 1: Install extension

Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore (search "axe DevTools")
Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/

Step 2: Scan page

Open page to test
Open DevTools (F12)
Click "axe DevTools" tab
Click "Scan ALL of my page"
Review violations

Step 3: Interpret results

Severity levels:

Critical: Must fix (blocks users)
Serious: Should fix (major barrier)
Moderate: Important to fix (usability issue)
Minor: Best practice (low impact)

Example violation:

Issue: Images must have alternate text
Impact: Critical
WCAG: 1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A)
Element: <img src="product.jpg">
Fix: Add alt attribute describing the image

Step 4: Export report

Click "Export results"
Choose CSV, JSON, or HTML
Share with development team

Manual Testing Protocols

Homepage Testing Checklist

Form Testing Checklist

Example accessible form:

<form action="/submit" method="POST">
  <div class="form-group">
    <label for="email">
      Email Address
      <span class="required" aria-label="required">*</span>
    </label>
    <input
      type="email"
      id="email"
      name="email"
      autocomplete="email"
      required
      aria-required="true"
      aria-describedby="email-error email-help"
    />
    <span id="email-help" class="help-text">We'll never share your email</span>
    <span id="email-error" class="error" role="alert" style="display:none;">
      Please enter a valid email address
    </span>
  </div>

  <button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>

Screen Reader Testing

NVDA Testing Guide (Windows)

Install NVDA:

Download from https://www.nvaccess.org/
Install and launch
NVDA starts speaking immediately

Basic commands:

Ctrl - Stop speaking
Insert+Down Arrow - Read from cursor
H - Next heading
L - Next link
F - Next form field
B - Next button
Tab - Next focusable element

What to listen for:

✅ Headings announced with level ("Heading level 2, About Us")
✅ Links announced with purpose ("Link, Learn more about WCAG 2.2")
✅ Images announced with alt text ("Graphic, Accessibility icon")
✅ Forms announce labels before inputs ("Email address, edit, blank")
❌ "Link" with no text (fix required)
❌ "Button" with no label (fix required)
❌ "Graphic" with no description (add alt text)

Testing Checklist by Page Type

E-Commerce Product Page:

Product name (h1 heading)
Product images with descriptive alt text
Price announced correctly
Variant selection (color, size) keyboard accessible
Quantity controls (+ / - buttons) labeled and keyboard accessible
Add to cart button clearly labeled
Cart updates announced to screen readers (aria-live)

Blog Post:

Article title (h1 heading)
Author, date, category announced
Heading structure logical (h2 for sections)
Images with contextual alt text
Links open in same window (or clearly indicate new window)
Share buttons labeled

Contact Form:

All inputs labeled
Required fields indicated
Error messages associated with inputs
Success message announced after submission

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

Sample template:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Site: https://example.com
Audit Date: November 10, 2025
Auditor: AllAccessible Team
Standard: WCAG 2.2 Level AA

OVERALL CONFORMANCE: Partially Conformant
- Conformance Level: WCAG 2.2 Level A (baseline)
- Level AA Conformance: 68% (58 of 86 success criteria met)
- Critical Issues: 14
- Total Issues: 127

SUMMARY:
The site has a solid foundation for accessibility but requires remediation
to achieve WCAG 2.2 Level AA conformance. Critical issues include missing
alt text, insufficient color contrast, and inaccessible forms. With focused
effort on the 14 critical issues, conformance can be achieved within 4-6 weeks.

PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Add alt text to all product images (affects 450 pages)
2. Update color scheme for 4.5:1 contrast (affects site-wide)
3. Fix form labels and error messages (affects 8 forms)
4. Implement keyboard navigation for dropdown menus

ESTIMATED REMEDIATION EFFORT: 120-160 hours
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000-$20,000 (if outsourced)

Detailed Findings

Issue template:

ISSUE #1: Missing Alternative Text for Images

WCAG Success Criterion: 1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A)
Severity: Critical
Impact: Screen reader users cannot access product information
Affected Pages: 450 product pages

DESCRIPTION:
Product images are missing alt attributes, preventing screen reader users
from understanding what products look like.

EXAMPLE:
Current code:
<img src="product-shirt-blue.jpg">

Recommended fix:
<img src="product-shirt-blue.jpg" alt="Men's blue cotton t-shirt, crew neck">

REMEDIATION STEPS:
1. Identify all images missing alt text (automated scan)
2. Add descriptive alt text for each product image
3. For decorative images, use alt=""
4. Test with screen reader to verify

EFFORT: 40 hours (450 products × 5 minutes each)
PRIORITY: CRITICAL - Complete within 2 weeks

Cost of Accessibility Audits

Pricing Breakdown

Audit Type	Scope	Time	Cost	Best For
DIY Automated	Unlimited	1-2 hours	Free-$500/year	Small sites, ongoing monitoring
DIY Manual	Small site	20-40 hours	Your time	Learning, budget constraints
Freelancer Audit	10-20 pages	16-32 hours	$1,500-$5,000	Small business sites
Agency Audit	50-100 pages	40-80 hours	$5,000-$25,000	Medium to large sites
Enterprise Audit	500+ pages	120-200 hours	$25,000-$75,000	Large enterprises, complex apps
Continuous Monitoring	Unlimited	Ongoing	$500-$5,000/month	SaaS platforms, high-traffic sites

What Affects Audit Cost?

1. Site Size:

10 pages: $1,500-$3,000
50 pages: $5,000-$10,000
100 pages: $10,000-$20,000
500+ pages: $25,000-$75,000

2. Complexity:

Simple: Marketing site, blog (+0%)
Medium: E-commerce, SaaS app (+50%)
Complex: Financial platform, healthcare portal (+100%)

3. Deliverables:

Basic report: Base cost
- VPAT documentation: +$1,000-$3,000
- Remediation support: +50% of audit cost
- User testing with people with disabilities: +$5,000-$15,000

4. Turnaround Time:

Standard (2-3 weeks): Base cost
Rush (1 week): +25-50%

DIY vs. Agency vs. Automated Audits

DIY Audit (Free to $500)

Pros:

✅ Zero cost (tools are free)
✅ Learn accessibility fundamentals
✅ Immediate results
✅ Full control over process

Cons:

❌ Time-intensive (20-40 hours)
❌ Requires accessibility knowledge
❌ May miss nuanced issues
❌ Not defensible in litigation

Best for:

Small businesses with technical staff
Agencies building internal capability
Ongoing monitoring after professional audit

Agency Audit ($5,000-$25,000)

Pros:

✅ Comprehensive coverage (100% of WCAG)
✅ Expert analysis and recommendations
✅ Legally defensible report
✅ VPAT documentation included
✅ Remediation guidance

Cons:

❌ Expensive ($5,000-$25,000)
❌ Slow turnaround (2-6 weeks)
❌ Point-in-time assessment (not ongoing)

Best for:

Medium to large businesses
Legal compliance requirements
Government/enterprise procurement (need VPAT)
Pre-litigation risk assessment

Automated Monitoring ($500-$5,000/month)

Pros:

✅ Continuous monitoring (catches new issues)
✅ Real-time alerts
✅ Scalable to large sites
✅ Trend reporting over time
✅ Integration with development workflow

Cons:

❌ Only catches ~30% of issues (automated only)
❌ Ongoing cost
❌ Requires interpretation

Best for:

SaaS platforms with frequent updates
E-commerce sites adding new products daily
Large content sites (news, blogs)
Agencies managing multiple client sites

Common Audit Findings

Top 10 Most Common Issues

1. Missing Alt Text (WCAG 1.1.1)

Frequency: 85% of sites
Impact: Critical - Blocks screen reader users
Fix: Add descriptive alt attributes to all <img> tags

2. Insufficient Color Contrast (WCAG 1.4.3)

Frequency: 78% of sites
Impact: Serious - Affects users with low vision
Fix: Update color palette to meet 4.5:1 minimum

3. Missing Form Labels (WCAG 3.3.2)

Frequency: 71% of sites
Impact: Critical - Forms unusable by screen readers
Fix: Add <label> elements associated with inputs

4. Empty Links (WCAG 2.4.4)

Frequency: 65% of sites
Impact: Serious - Link purpose unclear
Fix: Ensure all links have descriptive text

5. Missing Focus Indicators (WCAG 2.4.7)

Frequency: 62% of sites
Impact: Serious - Keyboard users can't see focus
Fix: Add visible :focus styles (3:1 contrast)

6. Incorrect Heading Structure (WCAG 1.3.1)

Frequency: 58% of sites
Impact: Moderate - Harder to navigate
Fix: Use proper heading hierarchy (h1 → h2 → h3)

7. Low Target Size (WCAG 2.5.8 - NEW in 2.2)

Frequency: 54% of sites
Impact: Serious - Mobile usability issues
Fix: Make interactive elements at least 24×24px

8. Missing Page Language (WCAG 3.1.1)

Frequency: 47% of sites
Impact: Moderate - Wrong screen reader pronunciation
Fix: Add lang attribute to <html> tag

9. Keyboard Traps (WCAG 2.1.2)

Frequency: 35% of sites
Impact: Critical - Users can't escape modals
Fix: Ensure focus can exit all components

10. Auto-Playing Media (WCAG 1.4.2)

Frequency: 28% of sites
Impact: Serious - Disrupts screen readers
Fix: Require user interaction to play media

Remediation Prioritization

Priority Matrix

Severity	WCAG Level	User Impact	Timeline
P0 - Critical	Level A	Blocks access	Fix within 1 week
P1 - High	Level AA	Significant barrier	Fix within 1 month
P2 - Medium	Level AA	Usability issue	Fix within 3 months
P3 - Low	Level AAA	Best practice	Fix when possible

Quick Wins vs. Long-Term Fixes

Quick Wins (1-2 weeks):

Add missing alt text to images
Fix color contrast issues (update CSS)
Add form labels
Fix empty links
Add skip links

Medium Effort (1-2 months): 6. Implement keyboard navigation for dropdowns 7. Fix heading structure 8. Add ARIA live regions for dynamic content 9. Fix focus management in modals 10. Increase touch target sizes

Long-Term Projects (3-6 months): 11. Redesign complex widgets (calendars, data tables) 12. Implement comprehensive error handling 13. Add audio descriptions to videos 14. Rebuild inaccessible third-party components 15. Full SPA accessibility overhaul

Free Audit Template Download

What's Included

Excel Template:

WCAG 2.2 Success Criteria checklist (86 criteria)
Issue tracking spreadsheet
Remediation prioritization matrix
Cost estimation calculator

PDF Checklist:

Page-by-page testing protocol
Keyboard navigation checklist
Screen reader testing guide
Color contrast verification

Sample Reports:

Executive summary template
Detailed findings template
VPAT (Accessibility Conformance Report) template

Download

Download Free Accessibility Audit Template →

(Includes Excel, PDF, and sample reports - no email required)

Conclusion

A website accessibility audit is essential for legal compliance and business growth. Whether you choose a DIY approach, hire an agency, or use automated monitoring, the key is to start auditing now rather than waiting for a lawsuit.

Key Takeaways:

✅ Audit regularly - Accessibility is ongoing, not one-time
✅ Use both automated and manual testing - Automated catches 30%, manual catches 70%
✅ Prioritize critical issues - Focus on blockers first (missing alt text, form labels)
✅ Document everything - Create audit trail for legal defense
✅ Budget appropriately - $5,000-$25,000 for professional agency audit
✅ Integrate into workflow - Test accessibility during development, not after launch

Next Steps:

Download the free audit template above
Run automated scan with axe DevTools (free)
Test keyboard navigation on your key pages
Fix critical issues identified (missing alt text, form labels)
Schedule quarterly audits to maintain compliance

Need help? AllAccessible provides automated accessibility monitoring with real-time alerts and AI-powered remediation suggestions. Start free trial →

Published: November 10, 2025 Last Updated: November 10, 2025 Reading Time: 35 minutes

About AllAccessible: We provide automated accessibility monitoring and remediation tools for websites, ensuring ongoing WCAG 2.2 compliance with real-time testing and AI-powered fixes. Learn more at allaccessible.org.

Website Accessibility Audit: Complete 2025 WCAG 2.2 Guide + Free Template

Website Accessibility Audit: Complete 2025 WCAG 2.2 Guide + Free Template

Table of Contents

What is an Accessibility Audit?

What an audit includes:

Why Conduct an Accessibility Audit

1. Legal Compliance

2. Business Benefits

3. Risk Mitigation

Types of Accessibility Audits

1. Automated Audit (Quick, Limited)

2. Manual Audit (Comprehensive, Time-Intensive)

3. Hybrid Audit (Automated + Expert Review)

WCAG 2.2 Audit Methodology

Step 1: Define Audit Scope

Step 2: Run Automated Scan

Step 3: Keyboard Navigation Testing

Step 4: Screen Reader Testing

Step 5: Color Contrast Testing

Step 6: Mobile Accessibility Testing

Automated Testing Tools

Tool Comparison Matrix

How to Use axe DevTools

Manual Testing Protocols

Homepage Testing Checklist

Form Testing Checklist

Screen Reader Testing

NVDA Testing Guide (Windows)

Testing Checklist by Page Type

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

Detailed Findings

Cost of Accessibility Audits

Pricing Breakdown

What Affects Audit Cost?

DIY vs. Agency vs. Automated Audits

DIY Audit (Free to $500)

Agency Audit ($5,000-$25,000)

Automated Monitoring ($500-$5,000/month)

Common Audit Findings

Top 10 Most Common Issues

Remediation Prioritization

Priority Matrix

Quick Wins vs. Long-Term Fixes

Free Audit Template Download

What's Included

Download

Conclusion

Share this article